Gatekeepers or Rent Seekers?
Open vs Closed Approach to Platform Management
Thanks to older friends/readers for forwarding this email to at least five of their office colleagues. You can add more of your friends to the Community of Platform’ed by using the following link.
Do share your feedback on this newsletter if you have not done it yet.
DTW
During the Week, there were multiple reports and analyses about Apple's ongoing talks with Google to integrate Google's Gemini artificial intelligence engine into iPhones, aiming to enhance iPhone software features. This potential collaboration underscores the complex interplay between large platforms like Apple and Google, reflecting the dynamics of open vs. closed platforms in the tech industry.
Apple's consideration of incorporating Google's AI signifies a shift towards leveraging external capabilities, moving beyond its traditional closed ecosystem approach. This move could broaden Google's AI reach to over 2 billion Apple devices, potentially challenging Microsoft-backed OpenAI's initiatives. The evolving relationship between Apple and Google exemplifies the ongoing debate between closed platforms, maintaining control over proprietary systems, and open platforms, embracing collaboration and external partnerships for innovation and market expansion. However, this partnership may also raise regulatory concerns, given Google's dominance in search and prior legal scrutiny over anti-competitive practices. Analysts see this as a strategic move for both companies, with Google gaining access to Apple's extensive user base and Apple reinforcing its AI capabilities.
The interplay between open and closed platforms in today's digital landscape is a multifaceted debate encompassing innovation, privacy, and anti-trust concerns. Examining examples from tech giants like Apple, Google, and Microsoft, alongside open digital public goods platforms, provides valuable insights into the dynamics shaping our digital future. Let's delve deeper into the analysis of open vs. closed platforms with examples from Apple, Microsoft, Google, and open digital public goods platforms like UPI and UID, focusing on innovation, privacy, and anti-trust.
1. Innovation:
- Apple (Closed Platform): Apple's iOS ecosystem is known for its closed nature, where the company tightly controls hardware, software, and app distribution. While this approach ensures a seamless user experience and robust security, it also limits third-party developers' freedom to innovate outside Apple's guidelines.
- Microsoft (Mixed Platform): Microsoft follows a mixed approach with Windows OS, offering both open and closed elements. The Windows platform allows extensive customization and integration, encouraging innovation among developers while maintaining essential proprietary components.
- Google (Open Platform): Google's Android operating system represents an open platform where developers have significant freedom to create and distribute apps independently. This openness fuels rapid innovation resulting in many apps and features available to users.
- UPI and Aadhaar (Open Digital Public Goods): Platforms like UPI (Unified Payments Interface) and Aadhaar (India's bio-metric ID system) are examples of open digital public goods. They provide essential infrastructure and standards that enable a wide range of applications and services, fostering innovation in digital payments, identity verification, and financial inclusion.
2. Privacy:
- Apple (Closed Platform): Apple emphasizes user privacy and data protection within its closed ecosystem. By tightly controlling app permissions and encryption standards, Apple aims to safeguard user information and maintain trust.
- Microsoft (Mixed Platform): Microsoft has made strides in enhancing user privacy across its platforms, balancing data security with user convenience. However, concerns arise regarding data collection and usage in certain Microsoft services, highlighting ongoing privacy challenges.
- Google (Open Platform): Google's open platform approach raises privacy concerns due to the extensive data collection practices associated with services like Gmail, Search, and Android. While users benefit from personalized experiences, data privacy issues often come into focus.
- UPI and Aadhaar (Open Digital Public Goods): UPI and Aadhaar platforms prioritize user data protection through stringent security measures and regulatory frameworks. However, public goods platforms must navigate challenges like data breaches and misuse, necessitating continuous improvement in privacy safeguards.
3. Anti-trust:
- Apple (Closed Platform): Apple has faced scrutiny over its App Store policies, with accusations of anti-competitive practices regarding app distribution, fees, and developer access. Regulators worldwide are examining Apple's market dominance and its impact on competition.
- Microsoft (Mixed Platform): Microsoft's history includes significant antitrust battles, particularly regarding its Windows operating system and Internet Explorer browser dominance. The company has since adopted more open practices and collaborative initiatives to address regulatory concerns.
- Google (Open Platform): Google's open platform strategy has attracted antitrust scrutiny, focusing on issues like search dominance, advertising practices, and Android's market position. Regulators assess Google's market power and its impact on fair competition.
- UPI and Aadhaar (Open Digital Public Goods): While UPI and Aadhaar are public goods platforms, regulatory oversight is essential to prevent anti-competitive behaviour among service providers and ensure equitable access for all participants.
In conclusion, the debate between open and closed platforms encompasses complex considerations of innovation, privacy, and anti-trust. Each approach has distinct advantages and challenges, and striking a balance between openness and regulation is crucial for fostering a healthy digital ecosystem. Industry collaboration, user empowerment, and effective governance mechanisms play pivotal roles in navigating these dynamics effectively. As gatekeepers, tech giants play a crucial role in keeping malicious actors out, ensuring user safety, and maintaining platform integrity. However, there's a delicate balance to strike, as overly stringent policies can stifle innovation and hinder competition, leading to a monopolistic environment. Striving for transparency, fair competition, and user-centric policies can help navigate this complex landscape, fostering a digital ecosystem that benefits both users and innovators while addressing concerns about market dominance and antitrust issues.
While I was still adding finishing touches to the week’s post, more news (bad?) came when the US Department of Justice sued Apple in a landmark anti-trust case.
I wrote a three-part series on Platform and Anti-trust. You may want to read Size does Matter, 800 Pounds Gorilla Unleashed and Taming 800 Pounds Gorilla!
The central thesis of the three-part series is as follows- Platforms gain extraordinary power through user-side network effects and commodification of suppliers and use access to cheap capital to execute Predatory Pricing and Vertical Integration. Governments must maintain oversight over platforms by continuously evaluating the threat to Customer Welfare and work towards the Preservation of Open Markets.
OTW
Over the Weekend, we travelled to Bengaluru to attend the marriage reception of Divya and Adithya, bridging a harmonious blend of cultures. The celebration, a testament to love's universality, left lasting memories of unity and cultural richness. It was a great time for Aru to catch up with the extended family and for us to renew our ties and create more memories.
We were also glad to meet up with my mentor and guide Dr Sharada Nayak. It was a great time to discuss her latest book and also listen to her excitement for her new book on her grandfather’s life. As usual, we chatted about our common friends and our love for cricket aka M S Dhoni. Her zeal for the pursuit of an independent and meaningful life even at 92 years is so inspirational for all of us.
Sharada Nayak's memoir intricately weaves together two narratives in her book “A Journey across Generations”. In "Mothers and Others," she unveils three generations of women in her family, offering profound insights into their lives intricacies. The second part chronicles her journey through India's transformative decades, from British schooling to the fervour of the independence movement. At 92 years young, she reflects on her kaleidoscopic life, shaped by remarkable individuals and pivotal national moments, including the historic midnight session of Parliament on August 15th, 1947. Through diaries, letters, and family history, themes of women's empowerment, societal evolution, and shared memories resonate deeply.
You could buy a copy at https://www.amazon.in/Journey-Across-Generations-Sharada-Nayak/dp/9360455148
I Love You
Shailendra
OTM
Opportunities through MountainSpeak are available with Shivang Sharma’s team at HDFC Bank
KAM - Branch & SME (Commercial cards)
Location -#Noida
Candidates with 3-5 years of business development experience in card sales/Payment business/Merchant Acquiring business will be preferred.
Role -It's a business development role, existing key account management, cross-selling, and New relationship sourcing.
In case interested, please share your resume with Shivang.sharma@hdfcbank.com
Use the subject line as your name - Role name- Location
Openness (Open platform) is like a sunflower turning toward the sun, inviting collaboration, sharing, and creativity. It encourages developers to work together and explore new ideas. Open platforms create a lively environment where different ideas come together, leading to new apps and services. But sometimes, this openness can be taken advantage of, causing concerns about privacy.
Closed platforms are like a walled garden, providing a controlled and secure space. Big tech companies manage these platforms to keep users safe. However, this control can also limit innovation, and there's a risk of monopolies forming.
In my opinion, HYBRID GARDEN (a mix of both open and closed) approach would be best. Collaboration and rules can work together to encourage innovation while maintaining safety and fairness. Transparency is crucial for building trust, and fair competition keeps things balanced. Users are essential for this digital ecosystem to thrive.
Really insightful. The case exemplifies the broader debate about the role of regulatory oversight in preventing monopolistic practices while encouraging innovation and safeguarding user privacy. This development signals a critical examination of how closed ecosystems operate within the broader digital economy. Hoping to learn more from upcoming writings.